ABM
How an SDR team executes
inside an ABM strategy.
My method, applied at several companies.
Elric Legloire  ·  Outbound Kitchen

ABM, to me:

How the GTM team (Marketing, Sales, SDR, AM, CS) aligns by tier to maximize our chances of winning new logos and expanding existing customers.
This is about your highest-LTV (Life Time Value) accounts. The acceptable CAC is higher: that is what funds the depth.
5 to 11 decision makers
per enterprise B2B purchase, spread across 5 different functions
Gartner B2B Buying Report, 2024
By tier

Who is involved, which channels: it depends on the tier.

Tier = fit x LTV. Channels are expensive: you stack them where the LTV justifies it.
TierAccount typeTeam involvedChannels
Tier 1 Strategic / must-win
high fit · high LTV
AE + SDR + ABM + Field Marketing + Execs + Partners Email, cold calls, LinkedIn, exec-to-exec, direct mail, partner intros, dedicated landing page, per-account ads, invite-only events
Tier 2 High-priority ICP AE + SDR + ABM + Field Marketing + PMM Email, cold calls, LinkedIn, competitor displacement campaigns, webinars, field events, targeted ads, pain-based content
Tier 3 Scaled intent / retargeting SDR + ABM + AE Email sequences, cold calls, LinkedIn touches, retargeting ads, content nurture, webinar invites, intent-triggered campaigns
The SDR's scope

The SDR does not stop at new business.
New logos AND customer expansion.

SDR
AwarenessEducationSelection Commit OnboardingAdoptionExpansion
the classic funnel: one-shot sale the full bow tie: recurring revenue
The problem

Most companies think they run an enterprise motion.
They run mid-market on enterprise accounts.

SMB approachEnterprise
Accounts500 / quarter50 / year
Contacts1 decision maker5 to 11 decision makers
Cycle30 days6 to 18 months
+130% win rate
with multi-threading on deals over $50K. Won enterprise deals: 17 contacts on average.
Gong, 1.8M deals analyzed, 2024
1 contact, 1 channel, zero Marketing / Sales / Post-Sales alignment: that is what kills deals, not the sales cycle.
Framework 1

The SDR does not come in first.
They enter an account the team has already prepared.

By the 1st contact, the buyer is already 61 to 69% through their journey6sense Buyer Experience, 2025 · ~4,000 B2B buyers
Account
selection
leadership, not the SDR
Account
warm-up
marketing + brand
Signals
The SDR starts HERE
Account plan
+ messaging
POV, mapping, data 1st + 3rd party
1st meeting
+ handoff
SDR → AE
The Snowflake model: monthly sales + marketing selection, ~3 weeks of ABM air cover, then the SDR goes in: 36 meetings per 100 accounts under ABM, versus 10 without. And deals close 2x faster (SQO → Won). Snowflake ABM team (Carpio / Henry), cohort A/B test, 2024
Framework 2 · Selection

Account selection: led by leadership, driven by data. Not by the SDR.

36,000 accounts
the raw TAM: everything that "could" buy
filter: modern data stack (public Castordoc case)
3,000 accounts
actually relevant
value per account: seats x ACV, not a Tier 1/2/3 label
Top accounts
where the team invests
5x higher conversion
Tier 1 accounts convert 5x better than lower-tier accounts. Selection IS the lever.
Outbound Kitchen
Lived at Chili Piper:
"Enterprise" by headcount (2,000 employees)... but 20 salespeople.
The fix: target accounts with 300+ people in GTM. The right criterion, not the easiest one.
Framework 3 · Persona mapping + top-down vs bottom-up

You do not map a person. You map a committee.

Why: a single thread dies with every departure or reorg. And each level does not hear the same message.
Top-down
StrategyGoal + messageLevelOwnerShare
Executive engagement
+ sponsorship
Influence. Message: strategic impact, ROI, vision. C-level · EVP/SVP
the budget
AE + exec sponsor 100 %
Book meetings Share insight + impact. Message: operational efficiency. VP
the influence
AE 25 % · SDR 75 % 25 / 75
above the linethe power linebelow
Groundswell
+ book meetings
Collect context. Identify problems to earn the right to go up. Director · Manager · IC
the field, the real pain
SDR 100 %
Bottom-up
Top-down first. Bottom-up when it stalls.
1 account = 100+ entry points
The field says it

Why bottom-up works: execs say it themselves.

Not one OR the other. Both.
A CRO's LinkedIn comment
a CRO, on LinkedIn: "I do not open anything unless a Director or VP in my org recommends it"
A Snowflake VP on cold outreach
a Snowflake VP: "the best way to get my attention is my team bringing me the topic"
The working doc

The account plan: where everything we just saw lands.

1 · Account research
10-K, earnings calls, news, org chart, history with you.
2 · Contact research
Key stakeholders, their roles, what matters to each.
3 · Your POV
Hypotheses: where you can help, why them, why now.
4 · Actions
Outreach, demo, content, events: who does what, when.
Free: I share my account plan template. Ask me and I will send it.
SDR execution

Never a single channel.
The channel follows the buyer, not the rep's preference.

The channels: EmailLinkedInPhoneOffice visitPersonalized siteGiftingEvents
Lived, May 2026:
dinner invitations during a trade show, top 10 accounts in Europe.
Result: 4 meetings booked across 10 accounts.
+150% qualified pipeline
with 1:1 web pages per account (account name, features pulled from calls, CTA to the assigned AE)
Mutiny x Snowflake case study
Real case · public
The full process on one account: from research to meeting.
1 · Research: "Gong data" on Spotify → an interview with a Gong data leader → the transcript.
2 · AI: not "summarize this interview", but "extract what is relevant to my product".
3 · Message: the interview → the challenge → how we help → CTA. 12 seconds to read.
4 · Account, not contact: the same research serves 6 different prospects at Gong.
5 · Result: meeting booked 2 hours after sending.
The actual LinkedIn message sent
the actual message sent
$75K
my biggest opportunity of the year, booked in 2 hours on a target account
Lived at Castor (2023), published in my newsletter
Real case · public
A replica Quake rocket launcher, sent to Vanta's CRO: a former professional Quake player. She posted about it on LinkedIn. She took the meeting.
Gift: $300
on an account worth $200K to $1M in ARR: cheaper than the cold email sequence it replaced. A budget shift, not an extra cost.
Outbound Kitchen · ABM gifting, Apr 2026
Hand-tested on 10 to 20 accounts. Then scaled to the top 200 with Clay + Claude Code.
~70% of accounts: no gift. The filter is what works.
The handwritten note sent with the gift
the actual handwritten note
Vanta's CRO's LinkedIn post
the CRO's post
A system.
The same method, in the US or in Europe.
If you remember one thing: pick the account before the person. The rest is execution.
Outbound Kitchen newsletter.outbound.kitchen
Bonus · free

Learned something?

If you want to see how Snowflake, Ramp, Rippling and other top companies actually run outbound: 8 Billion-Dollar Outbound Breakdowns, one teardown a day in your inbox, for 8 days.
Inside each email:
• What they do differently
• Full tech-stack breakdowns
• Real outreach examples
• Their outbound campaigns
How it works?
1. Drop your email.
2. One deep dive a day, for 8 days.
3. Swipe, test, and grow pipeline.
Get the 8 breakdowns
8 days, 8 companies:
1 · Snowflake · $4.6B+ ARR
2 · Ramp · $1B+ ARR
3 · Rippling · $570M+ ARR
4 · ClickUp · $300M+ ARR
5 · Pigment · $100M+ ARR
6 · Gorgias · $80M+ ARR
7 · Owner · $40M+ ARR
8 · HockeyStack · $70M+ pipeline in 8 months
Billion-Dollar Outbound Breakdowns
one breakdown a day, free
→ next  ·  ← back